There are some problems with the audio at some points.
I hope to make more comments on this debate in the future as time allows, but for now I remember one point that James White already refuted Shabir Ally on a long time ago.
At one point in the debate, Shabir Ally says that Luke 22:19-20 is not authentic. (either by the textual variant or by Shabir’s typical method of adopting liberal redaction criticism, which comes from a worldview that God cannot guide the writers of the NT by the Holy Spirit to write what they wrote. But this is contradictory to Islamic thinking.) He made this charge before in one of his debates with James White. Dr. White answered this charge long ago.
Thabiti asked Shabir why he didn’t realize that Mark and Matthew have that text, and even Shabir agrees that Mark was written before Luke, so Shabir’s argument makes no reasonable sense.