Skeptic Bart Ehrman vs. an even more Radical atheist skeptic

Bart Ehrman, Biblical scholar and liberal, skeptic, agnostic –  affirms the existance of Jesus, the crucifixion of Jesus, the apostle Paul’s letter to Galatians, James, the brother of Jesus

About Ken Temple

I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I am a sinner who has been saved by the grace of God alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), through faith alone (Galatians 2:16; Romans 3:28; 4:1-16), in Christ alone (John 14:6). But a true faith does not stay alone, it should result in change, fruit, good works, and deeper levels of repentance and hatred of my own sins of selfishness and pride. I am not better than you! I still make mistakes and sin, but the Lord is working on me, conforming me to His character. (Romans 8:28-29; 2 Corinthians 3:16-18) When I do sin, I hate the sin as it is an affront to God, and seek His forgiveness in repentance. (Mark 1:15; 2 Corinthians 7:7-10; Colossians 3:5-16 ) Praise God for His love for sinners (Romans 5:8), shown by the voluntary coming of Christ and His freely laying down His life for us (John 10:18), becoming flesh/human (John 1:1-5; 1:14; Philippians 2:5-8), dying for sins of people from all nations, tribes, and cultures (Revelation 5:9), on the cross, in history, rising from the dead (Romans 10:9-10; Matthew 28, Mark 16:1-8; Luke 24; John 20-21; 1 Corinthians chapter 15). His resurrection from the dead proved that Jesus is the Messiah, the eternal Son of God, the word of God from eternity past; and that He was all the gospels say He was and that He is truth and the life and the way to salvation. (John 14:6)
This entry was posted in Apologetics, atheism, Bart Ehrman, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Skeptic Bart Ehrman vs. an even more Radical atheist skeptic

  1. θ says:

    Creation of the mind is truly amazing. It took the language and a long line of code of program to make a robot do what the programmer wants. Now, how can we insist nobody ever creates a robot simply because it (or even its artificial intelligence) can do something like a sentient being?

    How can Atheists insist that there’s no God who creates the man and animal with the minds inside for doing and feeling something?

    A mind can’t suddenly know something without having God (Creator) to have written the programs in it.
    It is impossible for a robot to suddenly do something without having the human programmers (makers) to write a long line of A.I. coding before.
    Hence, Atheists are as a robot that rebels against its makers.

  2. θ says:

    Atheists are as the ridiculous people who insist that nobody created the robot with A.I. for their insistence of the non-existence of God who provides the man and animals with hard-wired great minds and natural feeling.

Comments are closed.