Category Archives: Dan Wallace

Jesus’ view of the Old Testament

Posted on February 15, 2020 by Ken Temple

  Dr. Dan Wallace of Dallas Seminary defends Jesus’ view of Scripture. The classic defense of Christ’s view of the OT is by John W. Wenham, Chapter 1 of “Inerrancy”, edited by Norman Geisler.   This book is a great book, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Jesus' Teaching, OT scholarship | 8 Comments

Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

Posted on February 15, 2020 by Ken Temple

  Dan Wallace’s book, “Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament” 

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

An early date for the Gospel according to John

Posted on February 5, 2020 by Ken Temple

Dr. Dan Wallace makes an excellent case for an early date for the Gospel according to John – 60s before the destruction of the temple.   Be sure to read and study the entire introduction and outline that Dr. Wallace provides.  … Continue reading →

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Gospel according to John, Gospel Truth, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments

Excellent introductions and outlines to each NT book by Dan Wallace

Posted on May 29, 2015 by Ken Temple

https://bible.org/series/new-testament-introductions-and-outlines Scholarly defense of each New Testament book regarding the date of Writing, author, background, theme of each book, outlines.

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Historical reliability of the Bible, New Testament background material, New Testament introductions, Reliability of the Bible | Comments Off on Excellent introductions and outlines to each NT book by Dan Wallace

Yusuf Ismail mis-quoted and distorted Dan Wallace

Posted on May 22, 2015 by Ken Temple

Dr. Dan Wallace and Dr. James White respond to Yusuf Ismail’s mis-quoting of Dr. Wallace’s section of John 1:1 in his Greek text, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics

Posted in Apologetics, Dan Wallace, Islam, John 1:1, Muslims | 1 Comment

Early Dating for the Gospel according to Mark

Posted on August 14, 2014 by Ken Temple

Dr. Dan Wallace makes a good case for an early dating for the gospel according to Mark, around 55-61 AD. This [Addendum: and other arguments from other scholars below] fully refutes Shabir Ally’s argument that Mark was written in 70 … Continue reading →

Posted in Apologetics, Dan Wallace, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, Reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments