Category Archives: Dan Wallace

Jesus’ view of the Old Testament

  Dr. Dan Wallace of Dallas Seminary defends Jesus’ view of Scripture. The classic defense of Christ’s view of the OT is by John W. Wenham, Chapter 1 of “Inerrancy”, edited by Norman Geisler.   This book is a great book, … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Jesus' Teaching, OT scholarship | 8 Comments

Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

  Dan Wallace’s book, “Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament” 

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Textual Variants

An early date for the Gospel according to John

Dr. Dan Wallace makes an excellent case for an early date for the Gospel according to John – 60s before the destruction of the temple.   Be sure to read and study the entire introduction and outline that Dr. Wallace provides.  … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Gospel according to John, Gospel Truth, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments

Excellent introductions and outlines to each NT book by Dan Wallace

https://bible.org/series/new-testament-introductions-and-outlines Scholarly defense of each New Testament book regarding the date of Writing, author, background, theme of each book, outlines.

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Historical reliability of the Bible, New Testament background material, New Testament introductions, Reliability of the Bible

Yusuf Ismail mis-quoted and distorted Dan Wallace

Dr. Dan Wallace and Dr. James White respond to Yusuf Ismail’s mis-quoting of Dr. Wallace’s section of John 1:1 in his Greek text, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics

Posted in Apologetics, Dan Wallace, Islam, John 1:1, Muslims | 1 Comment

Early Dating for the Gospel according to Mark

Dr. Dan Wallace makes a good case for an early dating for the gospel according to Mark, around 55-61 AD. This [Addendum: and other arguments from other scholars below] fully refutes Shabir Ally’s argument that Mark was written in 70 … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Dan Wallace, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, Reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments