Category Archives: Textual Variants

Debate: Is the New Testament Reliable?

There is lot I want to say about this debate – it is very good and instructive on what happens when you don’t properly expose someone to the textual variants and history of the NT transmission of the text, and … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Debate: Is the New Testament Reliable?

Intro to Textual Variants, TR Onlyism, KJV Onlyism

“TR” = “the Textus Receptus” – the Greek printed text behind the King James Version (1611) of the Bible, that developed through several editions that began with Erasmus (1516) collection of ONLY about 7 Greek manuscripts available to him at … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | 5 Comments

Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

  Dan Wallace’s book, “Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament” 

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

Great discussion on Inerrancy

In the first approximately 51 minutes and the last phone call, Dr. White has a great discussion on the doctrine of the Inerrancy of Scripture including the discussions between Peter Williams and Bart Ehrman and then Michael Licona and Richard … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Inerrancy, Reliability of the Bible, Synoptic Gospels, Textual Variants, Truth | Comments Off on Great discussion on Inerrancy

A “fundamentalist spirit / attitude”

What is wrong with a “fundamentalist spirit/attitude” that cannot discern nuances in disagreements on secondary and tertiary issues in other Christians? Dr. White discusses an upcoming possible debate (sometime in 2020) with Sam Shamoun over 2 issues: 1. Limited Atonement … Continue reading

Posted in "fundamentalist spirit / attitude", Apologetics, Christian Attitudes toward others, History, Sam Shamoun, Textual Variants | 7 Comments

Bart Ehrman: “The Doctrine of the Trinity is not based on one verse”. Muslim: “It’s not?!!”

A Muslim interviews Dr. Bart Ehrman.  The Muslim guy is shocked to learn from Bart Ehrman that the doctrine of the Trinity is not based on just one verse.   Ehrman says, “the doctrine of the Trinity is not based … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Islam, Muslims, Textual Variants, The doctrine of the Trinity | Comments Off on Bart Ehrman: “The Doctrine of the Trinity is not based on one verse”. Muslim: “It’s not?!!”

Reliability of the New Testament Text

Originally posted on Apologetics and Agape:
Dr. James White teaches on the reliability of the New Testament Text.

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Reliability of the New Testament Text

Response to Ijaz Ahmad on textual variants issues and claims

Dr. James White did an excellent job of refuting a Muslim named Ijaz Ahmad; his claims about John 20:28 and 9:38. Even Paul Williams, another Muslim, wrote:  “James White demolishes textual corruption claims by Ijaz”   On John 9:38, this … Continue reading

Posted in Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Response to Ijaz Ahmad on textual variants issues and claims

Response to Bart Ehrman’s “Misquoting Jesus”

see also Dr. James White’s debate with Dr. Bart Ehrman about the same issues:

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants, Truth | Comments Off on Response to Bart Ehrman’s “Misquoting Jesus”

Free (NT) vs. Controlled (Qur’an) Transmission of the Text

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims, Reliability of the Bible, Textual History of the Qur'an, Textual Variants | 1 Comment