Category Archives: Bible is not corrupted

Intro to Textual Variants, TR Onlyism, KJV Onlyism

“TR” = “the Textus Receptus” – the Greek printed text behind the King James Version (1611) of the Bible, that developed through several editions that began with Erasmus (1516) collection of ONLY about 7 Greek manuscripts available to him at … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | 5 Comments

Jesus’ view of the Old Testament

  Dr. Dan Wallace of Dallas Seminary defends Jesus’ view of Scripture. The classic defense of Christ’s view of the OT is by John W. Wenham, Chapter 1 of “Inerrancy”, edited by Norman Geisler.   This book is a great book, … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Jesus' Teaching, OT scholarship | 8 Comments

Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

  Dan Wallace’s book, “Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament” 

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Textual Variants

An early date for the Gospel according to John

Dr. Dan Wallace makes an excellent case for an early date for the Gospel according to John – 60s before the destruction of the temple.   Be sure to read and study the entire introduction and outline that Dr. Wallace provides.  … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Gospel according to John, Gospel Truth, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments

Great discussion on Inerrancy

In the first approximately 51 minutes and the last phone call, Dr. White has a great discussion on the doctrine of the Inerrancy of Scripture including the discussions between Peter Williams and Bart Ehrman and then Michael Licona and Richard … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Inerrancy, Reliability of the Bible, Synoptic Gospels, Textual Variants, Truth

An Excellent Debate on the Bible vs. the Qur’an

 

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims

Debate: Is the Bible Inerrant? Licona vs. Howe

Overall, Richard Howe is on the more correct side of  this dialogue / debate.  Licona seems fuzzy on what his position on Inerrancy is.  Some of the examples from the gospels are explained by harmonization, which Licona just dismisses as … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Inerrancy, Truth | 1 Comment

Resurrection accounts of Jesus harmonized

https://www.answering-islam.org/Andy/Resurrection/harmony.html https://answersingenesis.org/jesus-christ/resurrection/christs-resurrection-four-accounts-one-reality/  

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible, The Resurrection of Jesus Christ, Truth

Context of Surah 2:79 is 2:78 and 2:75

Muslims charge the Christians and Jews with altering, changing, corrupting the text of the previous Scriptures.  (previous to the Qur’an)  Yet the Qur’an teaches that the previous Scriptures are not corrupted or changed.  (Surah 10:94; 5:46-48; 5:68) See here One … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims | 2 Comments

Muslim argument defeated

To begin, this is an illogical argument because one can take any religious text and add or delete a verse from it. There’s no magical force field around the text itself. Stewjo004, a Muslim, and author of the article: “Corruption of … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims | 30 Comments