Category Archives: Bible is not corrupted

Trinity vs. Tawheed

This was an excellent debate where James White explains and defends the doctrine of the Trinity vs. a Muslim named Jake Brancatella, who uses worldly human philosophy over God’s Revelation (the New Testament). God has revealed Himself in history through … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims, The doctrine of the Trinity, Theology, Theology of God | Comments Off on Trinity vs. Tawheed

The Qur’an never says the text of the Bible was corrupted

Originally posted on Apologetics and Agape:
An excellent presentation by a former Muslim. In the first videos, notice the difference between “lafz” لفظ (word) and “Ma’ani” معنی (meaning).  We have the Arabic word “lafz” لفظ in Farsi also, which indicates…

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, Reliability of the Bible, Truth | Comments Off on The Qur’an never says the text of the Bible was corrupted

Debate: Is the New Testament Reliable?

There is lot I want to say about this debate – it is very good and instructive on what happens when you don’t properly expose someone to the textual variants and history of the NT transmission of the text, and … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Debate: Is the New Testament Reliable?

Context of Surah 2:79 is 2:78 and 2:75

Originally posted on Apologetics and Agape:
Muslims charge the Christians and Jews with altering, changing, corrupting the text of the previous Scriptures.  (previous to the Qur’an)  Yet the Qur’an teaches that the previous Scriptures are not corrupted or changed.  (Surah…

Posted in Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims, Truth | 100 Comments

Intro to Textual Variants, TR Onlyism, KJV Onlyism

“TR” = “the Textus Receptus” – the Greek printed text behind the King James Version (1611) of the Bible, that developed through several editions that began with Erasmus (1516) collection of ONLY about 7 Greek manuscripts available to him at … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants | 5 Comments

Jesus’ view of the Old Testament

  Dr. Dan Wallace of Dallas Seminary defends Jesus’ view of Scripture. The classic defense of Christ’s view of the OT is by John W. Wenham, Chapter 1 of “Inerrancy”, edited by Norman Geisler.   This book is a great book, … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Jesus' Teaching, OT scholarship | 8 Comments

Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

  Dan Wallace’s book, “Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament” 

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Textual Variants | Comments Off on Analyzing Bart Ehrman’s “The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture”, by Dan Wallace

An early date for the Gospel according to John

Dr. Dan Wallace makes an excellent case for an early date for the Gospel according to John – 60s before the destruction of the temple.   Be sure to read and study the entire introduction and outline that Dr. Wallace provides.  … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Dan Wallace, Gospel according to John, Gospel Truth, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible | 2 Comments

Great discussion on Inerrancy

In the first approximately 51 minutes and the last phone call, Dr. White has a great discussion on the doctrine of the Inerrancy of Scripture including the discussions between Peter Williams and Bart Ehrman and then Michael Licona and Richard … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Inerrancy, Reliability of the Bible, Synoptic Gospels, Textual Variants, Truth | Comments Off on Great discussion on Inerrancy

An Excellent Debate on the Bible vs. the Qur’an

 

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslims | Comments Off on An Excellent Debate on the Bible vs. the Qur’an