Category Archives: Bible is not corrupted

Michael Kruger demonstrates the problems with Bart Ehrman’s theory

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/book-reviews-jesus-before-the-gospels

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Historical Jesus

Muslim scholar Abdel Haleem agrees that the Qur’an does not teach that the text of the Previous Scriptures was corrupted

These quotes by this Muslim scholar, Muhammad Abdel Haleem, would affirm that Surah 5:47; 5:68; 10:94; 3:3-4; 2:136; 29:46 do not teach that the Christian Scriptures were corrupted in their written text; and that Surah 2:79, 3:78, and 5:13 refer … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Islam, Muslim scholar, Muslims, Paul Bilal Williams | 1 Comment

Martin Hengel and R. T. France on the Gospel titles, κατα Μαθθαιον, κατα Μαρκον, κατα Λυκαν, κατα Ιωαννην

Ibn Issam wrote: Sorry but Jesus did not “predict His own arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection several times.” The Gospels were written by unknown pseudepigraphal authors who were writing about the events after the fact. I understand that argument, … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Canon of Scripture, Gospel according to John, Gospel according to Luke, Gospel according to Mark, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, Reliability of the Bible, The 4 gospels and their titles | 1 Comment

Reliability of the New Testament, by Craig Blomberg

http://exegeticaltools.com/2016/11/07/craig-blombergs-comprehensive-study-reliability-new-testament/  

Posted in Bible is not corrupted, Bible Study, Historical reliability of the Bible

Who focuses on context?

Paul Williams exhorted me to look at Bassam Zawadi’s article here: Ken get yourself up to speed on the primary sources: here  (at Bassam Zawadi’s “Call to Monotheism”) Here is what I noticed about he treated Surah 2:79: Bassam Zawadi … Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, Paul Bilal Williams, Truth | 1 Comment

Response to Ijaz Ahmad on textual variants issues and claims

Dr. James White did an excellent job of refuting a Muslim named Ijaz Ahmad; his claims about John 20:28 and 9:38. Even Paul Williams, another Muslim, wrote:  “James White demolishes textual corruption claims by Ijaz”   On John 9:38, this … Continue reading

Posted in Bible is not corrupted, Historical reliability of the Bible, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants

Response to Bart Ehrman’s “Misquoting Jesus”

see also Dr. James White’s debate with Dr. Bart Ehrman about the same issues:

Posted in Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, Reliability of the Bible, Textual Variants, Truth