Category Archives: Historical reliability of the Bible

Problems for “Limited Inerrancy”

https://frame-poythress.org/problems-for-limited-inerrancy/

Posted in Historical reliability of the Bible, Inerrancy, Truth | Leave a comment

Review of Peter Enn’s book

A Review of Peter Enn’s book, “The Bible Tells me so” – review by Dr. Michael Kruger https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/bible-tells/  

Posted in Apologetics, Historical reliability of the Bible, Inerrancy | Leave a comment

Medical Journal on the Physical Death of Jesus Christ

Proof of the fatal torture, crucifixion, and death of Christ from a medical journal.  Positive proof that Islam is wrong (Surah 4:157).  If Surah 4:157 is wrong, then all of Islam is proved false. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19648788_On_the_Physical_Death_of_Jesus_Christ  

Posted in Apologetics, Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, Death of Jesus on the cross, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims

Resurrection accounts of Jesus harmonized

https://www.answering-islam.org/Andy/Resurrection/harmony.html https://answersingenesis.org/jesus-christ/resurrection/christs-resurrection-four-accounts-one-reality/  

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Historical Jesus, Historical reliability of the Bible, The Resurrection of Jesus Christ, Truth

Martin Hengel and R. T. France on the Gospel titles, κατα Μαθθαιον, κατα Μαρκον, κατα Λυκαν, κατα Ιωαννην

Originally posted on Apologetics and Agape:
Ibn Issam wrote: Sorry but Jesus did not “predict His own arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection several times.” The Gospels were written by unknown pseudepigraphal authors who were writing about the events after…

Posted in Apologetics, Gospel according to John, Gospel according to Luke, Gospel according to Mark, Historical reliability of the Bible, Islam, Muslims, The 4 gospels and their titles

Historical Evidence for the Gospels, Dr. Timothy McGrew

Posted in Apologetics, Bart Ehrman, Bible is not corrupted, church history, early church history, Gospel according to John, Gospel according to Luke, Gospel according to Mark, Historical reliability of the Bible

The “I am” statements in the Gospel according to John

A good defense of the “I am” statements in the Gospel of John as historically true and reliable. https://robertbowman.net/2017/10/04/top-10-reasons-for-accepting-jesus-i-am-sayings-in-john-as-historically-reliable/#_edn11

Posted in Apologetics, Bible is not corrupted, Gospel according to John, Historical reliability of the Bible, Truth | 1 Comment